Back to home

How We Rate Operators

Our Trust Score and editorial ratings are built on eight weighted criteria applied consistently across every sportsbook, casino, and poker operator we review.

Overview

The White List Trust Score is a composite rating from 0 to 100 that reflects how confidently we recommend an operator based on licensing, security, payments, product quality, and player protection. It is paired with an overall user rating out of 5 derived from our editorial assessment and publicly available player feedback trends.

No single factor determines a score. We weight criteria based on their impact on player safety and day-to-day experience. Operators cannot pay to improve their Trust Score or ranking position.

Trust Score Explained

What the number on every operator card and review page actually means.

90–100
Excellent — strongly recommended
80–89
Good — reliable with minor trade-offs
Below 80
Consider alternatives carefully

Scores are recalculated when we identify material changes to licensing, payout performance, or product availability. Last site-wide review: Aug 5, 2026.

Evaluation Criteria

Eight factors applied to every operator in our comparison database.

Licensing & Regulation

High weight

We verify that operators hold valid licences from recognised regulators such as the UK Gambling Commission, Malta Gaming Authority, or NT Racing Commission. Unlicensed or grey-market operators receive significantly lower scores.

Security & Fair Play

High weight

We assess SSL encryption, account verification processes, game fairness certifications, and the operator's track record on player fund protection and dispute resolution.

Payment Methods

Medium weight

Breadth of deposit and withdrawal options matters — including cards, e-wallets, bank transfer, and crypto where relevant. We also note regional payment availability.

Withdrawal Speed

High weight

How quickly verified players receive payouts is a core trust signal. We track typical processing times and flag operators with consistent same-day or instant options.

User Experience

Medium weight

Site navigation, market depth, game discovery, and overall product polish contribute to the score. A confusing interface increases friction and error risk for players.

Customer Support

Medium weight

Availability of live chat, email, and help centres — plus response quality during our review process — informs this criterion.

Bonus Terms

Medium weight

Welcome offers are evaluated alongside wagering requirements, expiry periods, and game restrictions. Transparent, achievable terms score higher than inflated headline numbers.

Mobile Experience

Medium weight

Native app quality, mobile web performance, and feature parity with desktop are assessed. Mobile-first operators receive credit where the experience is genuinely strong.

Our Rating Process

Each operator review begins with licence verification and product audit across available verticals — sportsbook, online casino, live dealer, and poker. We assess payment options, typical withdrawal times, mobile experience, and bonus transparency.

Editorial content is written independently, then cross-checked against our scoring rubric. Pros, cons, FAQs, and audience guidance (who should use / who should avoid) are included on every review page to give readers actionable context beyond a single number.

Update Frequency

We review operator data on a rolling basis and publish full editorial updates when licensing, bonuses, or payout performance changes materially. Minor corrections are applied as needed. Each operator review displays a “Last Updated” date on its detail page.

Read Our Operator Reviews